6to4 stats found, are there other places?

Nick Hilliard nick at foobar.org
Sun Apr 17 22:48:54 CEST 2011


On 17/04/2011 21:38, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
> It's a pity that 6to4 deprecation is being discussed within the IETF at
> the moment, because I would like to see the issues fixed instead
> throwing the thing away (whatever that degree may be).

It's not a pity, really.  The protocol is terminally broken because it 
cannot work around return-path blackholing.

We need to move beyond 6to4.  Static tunnels work, as does teredo.

Nick


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list