6to4 stats found, are there other places?
    Nick Hilliard 
    nick at foobar.org
       
    Sun Apr 17 22:48:54 CEST 2011
    
    
  
On 17/04/2011 21:38, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
> It's a pity that 6to4 deprecation is being discussed within the IETF at
> the moment, because I would like to see the issues fixed instead
> throwing the thing away (whatever that degree may be).
It's not a pity, really.  The protocol is terminally broken because it 
cannot work around return-path blackholing.
We need to move beyond 6to4.  Static tunnels work, as does teredo.
Nick
    
    
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list