I-D Action:draft-azinger-scalable-addressing-00.txt

[Tony Li]

>> If that's an acceptable solution, then pick any arbitrary path from the N*M possible address pairs and use that.  Same result.
> 
> No, it isn't.  In the "single source, single destination" address, I have
> network elements and network admins that feel compelled to make sure that
> this single combination is the one that works.
> 
> In the N*M problem, the problem is shifted to the end systems, and it's
> to be expected that there is a difference in quality between the possible
> combinations.  So I have a "find the best combination out of N*M" problem
> here, while in the first case I only have a single combination, and there
> is no need to select anything in the end host.
> 
> For me, this looks like quite a different thing.


So if you have N entries then your network admins won't bother to make them work?

Seems to me like you need new network admins.

Tony