I-D Action:draft-azinger-scalable-addressing-00.txt

[Doug Barton]

On 9/28/2010 10:37 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> I think one of the key things they may not realise, probably
> because they are just treating IPv6 as nothing more than IPv4 with
> bigger addresses, is that there is a transition period where the old
> addresses are phased out, potentially over a number of weeks or months.
> They probably assume it is an instant event that doesn't give them any
> preparation time to manage the process of e.g. updating ACLs, router
> interface configurations etc.

A) Add "years" to your list of time periods. Just because an enterprise 
gets v6 doesn't mean their v4 magically goes away, and

B) Do you have *any* evidence for this perspective at all? Because I'm 
not seeing it (the perspective you describe that is).


Doug

-- 

	... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
			-- Propellerheads

	Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
	a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/