nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
Sun Sep 26 06:00:58 CEST 2010
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:31:08 -0700
David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> >> I may be a bit of a curmudgeon here, but I think one sentiment you might
> >> hear from the operations community is: "No thank-you. The IETF has
> >> already done more than enough to place obstacles in front of IPv6
> >> adoption, particularly by 'end sites'. We don't need to add to that."
> > I'm curious as to what specifically these obstacles are or have been?
So renumbering not being easy is an obstacle that the IETF has put in
place to hold back adoption, as per the original assertion? IOW, are you
asserting that renumbering is actually easy, but the IETF have chosen
to make it hard?
More information about the ipv6-ops