Operational challenges of no NAT
chbm at chbm.net
Thu Oct 28 13:05:46 CEST 2010
On 2010/10/28, at 07:31, George Bonser wrote:
> Yes, I understand that this process is going to take some sorting out on
> both sides of the transaction but my question is if anyone else has run
> into this sort of problem and how did you crack that nut?
I really don't see how v6 changes this. You had a load balancer or a NAT box in v4 and you can have a load balancer or NAT box in v6. I'm sure some vendor can solve this for you for the right amount of money.
More information about the ipv6-ops