Real world use for the U/L bit?
Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Sun Nov 14 21:38:23 CET 2010
Today - it is no use. Just a rule.
The reason it is in the address architecture is stated explicitly
in RFC 4291:
"The use of the universal/local bit in the Modified EUI-64 format
identifier is to allow development of future technology that can take
advantage of interface identifiers with universal scope."
This was in the hope of a multihoming solution that would avoid PI prefixes.
That is still an active hope.
On 2010-11-14 23:26, Roger Wiklund wrote:
> I'm having problems understanding the _use_ for the U/L bit.
> I understand the concept, but I don't understand the use for it.
> The U/L bit is the seventh bit of the first byte and is used to
> determine whether the address is universally or locally administered.
> If the U/L bit is set to 0, the IEEE, through the designation of a
> unique company ID, has administered the address. If the U/L bit is set
> to 1, the address is locally administered. The network administrator
> has overridden the manufactured address and specified a different
> So if the EUI-64 address is created using the OUI, its universally
> administered. If the MAC is manually configured for some reason, its
> locally administered.
> But why do I need to know this? When will I actually have to login to
> a router/whatever to check how the U/L is set? We still have DAD if
> two admins accidently use the same manually configured MAC address or
> something stupid like that.
More information about the ipv6-ops