Linux source address selection vs. EUI-64

Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.org
Sat Nov 13 16:32:25 CET 2010


On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 03:36:57PM +0100, Geert Hendrickx wrote:

> For individual hosts (esp. in a VPS environment), assigning a /64 or
> larger makes little sense to me, a /96 is more than enough.

Is that an official recommendation? I currently have a single /56,
which I would like to distribute over several thousands customers,
each on a virtual server, with currently one static IPv4 address.

I can see how a /96 for each customer would be more than enough
(especially that since hundreds of customers are going to share
the same MAC, due to the low-overhead virtualization technology
used). 

Presumably, in above context it would be a sane thing to parcel 
the /56 into /64, each for one physical server's distinct NIC 
MAC, and from each /64 a /96 for each virtual server?


-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list