Operational challenges of no NAT

Mateusz Blaszczyk blahu77 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 1 21:08:11 CET 2010


On 29 October 2010 21:06, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Which leaves well meaning people attempting to find, universally
> described as non-ideal, technology solutions to deploy IPv6 over
> IPv4-only CPE / UE
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuarsingh-v6ops-6to4-provider-managed-tunnel-00#section-2

My network (as it is at the moment) could benefit from such 6to4
NAT66'ed access method.
Is it something you have seen working? Or was it just a pointer to
show to was lengths ppl are forced to get v6 running?

> Cameron


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list