On killing IPv6 transition mechanisms

[Antonio Querubin]

On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Erik Kline wrote:

> 2002::/16 at one point, IIRC.  There is indeed a list of caveats
> w.r.t. these latency numbers: they are only Google's observations
> based on the state of everyone else's 192.88.99.0/24 and whatever
> 2002::/16 we were being advertised during the measurement period.

Are you saying Google doesn't run a 6to4 gateway of its own?  That would 
at least eliminate some indeterminancy going in the Google IPv6 to user 
6to4 host direction.

Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp:  tony at lava.net