On killing IPv6 transition mechanisms
tony at lava.net
Tue Mar 16 10:49:32 CET 2010
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Erik Kline wrote:
> 2002::/16 at one point, IIRC. There is indeed a list of caveats
> w.r.t. these latency numbers: they are only Google's observations
> based on the state of everyone else's 184.108.40.206/24 and whatever
> 2002::/16 we were being advertised during the measurement period.
Are you saying Google doesn't run a 6to4 gateway of its own? That would
at least eliminate some indeterminancy going in the Google IPv6 to user
6to4 host direction.
e-mail/xmpp: tony at lava.net
More information about the ipv6-ops