On killing IPv6 transition mechanisms
Doug Barton
dougb at dougbarton.us
Sun Mar 14 20:58:54 CET 2010
On 03/14/10 12:09, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>>>>>> Alex Broque <broquea at he.net> writes:
>>>>>> Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>
> >> I know the difference. The problem is that HE.net offers just a few
> >> /64, and I need somewhat larger address space. And they don't seem
> >> to offer reverse DNS, which is available for 6to4.
>
> > Just want to clarify some points. We've offered reverse DNS
> > delegation for the /64 statically routed subnet since at least 2003,
> > although it was a lot more manual configuration on our side back
> > then. Then the /48 subnets since early 2008, which ushered in a more
> > automated process for delegation for both /64 and /48 subnets. And
> > yes, those are the only subnets that the user gets delegation control
> > over.
>
> Perhaps I'm confusing the things up now, but I don't remember
> seeing reverse DNS being offered at https://tunnelbroker.net/,
> and I don't remember seeing /48 without ASN, either. Anyway,
> it's good to know that they are available now. Thanks.
I've had my tunnel since May 2008, and I can confirm that the /48 was
offered at that time:
http://www.tunnelbroker.net/forums/index.php?topic=106.0
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
More information about the ipv6-ops
mailing list