On 6to4 gateway and recommended MTU setting
ek at google.com
Thu Mar 11 12:56:53 CET 2010
On 11 March 2010 20:40, Martin Millnert <martin at millnert.se> wrote:
> Hello list,
> was discussing best 6to4-relay interface MTU size with a friend and
> basically need more and wiser input.
> Apparently, Free BSD has a unmodifiable, static value of 1280 for the
> 6in4-interface. It could be argued that this follows 4213 3.2.1
> ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4213#section-3.2.1 ). OSX also has a
> static value of 1280, unmodifiable (I try to stay away from OSX, could
> this be due to the kernel being the same?). XP reportedly also defaults
> to 1280, and I see my Windows 7-box does the same for 6to4, which
> appears once I deactivate native IPv6 on my LAN interface (netsh
> interface ipv6 show subinterfaces).
> Linux on the other hand defaults to 1480, but it is changeable.
> A working PMTUd will resolve MTU problems, both on underlying IPv4 node
> <-> 6to4-gateway, but this isn't the issue at the moment.
> The issue is what MTU value a single random 6to4-gateway today should
> have (purposefully not considering "the whole"), to maximize good
> interoperability and minimize problems.
> I'm not really concerned with the values of a end-node's 6to4 interface.
> I am not satisfied by the reasoning in 4213#3.2.1 in this regard, hence
> this mail. 3.2.1 to me doesn't seem to talk about a the MTU value of the
> interface on a globally announced relay gateway.
Not to be too snarky, but how about 0? Just let 6to4 die. Please,
please, please don't waste any time with 6to4.
More information about the ipv6-ops