disabling client use of SLAAC

[Mark Kamichoff]

On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 09:36:56AM +1030, Mark Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 21:32:00 +0100
> Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at marcoh.net> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On 5 mrt 2010, at 21:24, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > 
> > > On 2010-03-05 22:24, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> > > ...
> > >> The M and O flags says "get info via DHCP", but it seems they don't mean
> > >> "do NOT use SLAAC" if I read http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2462.txt correctly?
> > >> 
> > >> So bottom line, how to make clients not use SLAAC with a Cisco router?
> > >> 
> > > 
> > > Note that this is known to be a tricky area in mutlti-vendor, multi-o/s
> > > situations.
> > 
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > Can't agree more. In the meantime, what about extending the subnet mask a few bits (/80) on the lan ?
> 
> Why?

Autoconf doesn't work for on >64 bit prefixes, so extending it to an 80
is a [interesting] way of disabling it completely.

- Mark

-- 
Mark Kamichoff
prox at prolixium.com
http://www.prolixium.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20100306/74b89acf/attachment.bin