Thoughts about ipv6 white listing

[Erik Kline]

>>> The right solution is: make them work, which is mainly the
>>> responsibility of the ISPs at the content provider end.
>>
>> I'm really not sure how to parse this last sentence.  Can you clarify?
>
> I think my previous reply to Tore explained what I mean, and
> I need to write a draft, but now I will be out for a week, so
> I will try to work on this before the end of the year.

Ok, I think I understand.  I disagree*, but I think I know what you meant.

-Erik

* pain:
[1] rfc1918 (unless you also do NAT66, in which case shoot me now)
[2] PathMTU nuisance (though pmtud /must/ work or it's a broken
deployment, I know)
[3] the fact that 192.88.99.1 + 2002:: means /everyone/ must play, and
therefore incremental deployment is not sufficiently beneficial, which
is precisely what hasn't worked in all these years
[N] ...