Thoughts about ipv6 white listing

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 03:43:49AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> V6 will be deployed for people who have v6 and can request a v6
> resource over v6.  The reason is very simple.  I don't have time
> to enter in white list entries for "joe's fish farm and Internet
> service".  If Joe's Fish Farm sends me a AAAA request that arrives
> over v6, I will honor it.  If Joe's Fish Farm sends me a request
> via v4, I am not sure of the state of their network so I am going
> to give them the "safe" response.

The transport protocol that delivers the DNS request from the DNS recursor
that Joe is using to you has *nothing* to do with whether "Joe's Fish Farm"
is v6 capable or not.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20101204/36224a53/attachment.sig>