Question about 6to4
Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
evyncke at cisco.com
Mon May 18 13:54:06 CEST 2009
Actually, Rémi has a draft to push the 6RD parameters via DHCPv4, so, it could be implemented by any CPE (or even RG through GUI), even non-managed CPE
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6-ops-bounces+evyncke=cisco.com at lists.cluenet.de
> [mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+evyncke=cisco.com at lists.cluenet.de]
> On Behalf Of Mohacsi Janos
> Sent: lundi 18 mai 2009 11:40
> To: Martin List-Petersen
> Cc: Erik Kline; ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de
> Subject: Re: Question about 6to4
> On Fri, 15 May 2009, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> > Erik Kline wrote:
> >> Personally, I'm a fan of 6rd. That's what works for
> free.fr. That,
> >> or just go native.
> > The issue with 6rd is, that it's consuming extreme amounts of IP's.
> > Free.fr got a /26 IPv6 allocated just to do this for all of
> their customers.
> > Native, this probably could have been done well within a
> /32 or /30 at
> > the most.
> > So I wouldn't even try to advocate to go down the route,
> that Free did
> > and use 6rd.
> I think there is a bigger problem from 6rd: the provider
> should have control over customers' home router - at least
> forcing of upgrade of firmware and push some configuration
> parameters 6rd routing...
> Best Regards,
> Janos Mohacsi
> Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network
> Planning and Projects NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 70EF9882:
> DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
More information about the ipv6-ops