Biggest mistake for IPv6: It's not backwards compatible, developers admit

[Pierfrancesco Caci]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 16:52, Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi at niif.hu> wrote:

> okay it seems to me, that shim6 is a good candidate for your problem with
> some extension allowing specifing amount of outgoing traffic going on
> paralel links.

And incoming. Eyeball-prevalent networks will need to do more TE on
the incoming traffic. You can't always expect the other side to be
fully cooperative, unfortunately.



-- 
 Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx