issue with SLAAC and deprecated IPv6 addresses on recent windowsversions

Christian Hahn hahn at berkom.de
Wed Dec 2 09:41:38 CET 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sean Siler schrieb:
> Or you could get really luck and have the guy who owns IPv6 in Windows see your bug while browsing IPv6 Ops. :)
> 
> This is a terrific catch, Christian. I'll ask some folks to take a look at it.
That's nice news, Sean. Please let us know, if you can confirm that bug and also
if there is any progress in kicking it out ;)

cheers,
Christian
- ------------------
gpg fingerprint:
31E4 283B 5EFD 920C 3DD4  CC3E EA43 16EC 75BC EB6D

> 
> 
> Sean Siler
> Sr. IPv6 Program Manager
> Microsoft
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6-ops-bounces+sean.siler=microsoft.com at lists.cluenet.de [mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+sean.siler=microsoft.com at lists.cluenet.de] On Behalf Of Scott Beuker
> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 13:06
> To: Christian Hahn
> Cc: IPv6 Ops list
> Subject: RE: issue with SLAAC and deprecated IPv6 addresses on recent windowsversions
> 
> Interesting bug, nice job in finding it.
> 
> I was talking to a friend who works at MS about what (if any) viable
> avenues there are to report a bug like this and actually stand a chance
> of getting it resolved. He recommend this:
> 
> http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/Feedback
> 
> I have no idea how much mileage you would get down this avenue, but if
> you're feeling optimistic give it a shot, and let me know and I'll be
> sure to create an account just to vote your bug up. :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ipv6-ops-bounces+scott.beuker=sjrb.ca at lists.cluenet.de
>> [mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+scott.beuker=sjrb.ca at lists.cluenet.de] On
>> Behalf Of Christian Hahn
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 8:54 AM
>> To: IPv6 Ops list
>> Subject: issue with SLAAC and deprecated IPv6 addresses on recent
>> windowsversions
>>
> Hi list,
> 
> In a lab I did some testing with SLAAC and different OSs and recently
> stumbled
> upon an issue on recent windows versions. It is only present on Vista
> and 7, not
> on XP. But let me tell you the story ...
> 
> I deprecated an formerly (by RA) announced IPv6 prefix (let's say
> 2001:db8:1:2::/64) by  sending some RAs with PreferredLifetime=0 and
> ValidLifetime=7200 and thereafter stopped sending RAs.
> All windows machines behaved correctly and deprecated the addresses
> derived from
> that prefix. Outgoing connections no longer used it as source address,
> but
> incoming packets (like icmpv6 echo request) where answered due to the
> valid
> "ValidLifetime" value. ;)
> 
> Then in the second step (after some minutes of testing) I tried to re-
> activate
> the _same_ prefix (2001:db8:1:2::/64) by sending periodic RAs with
> PreferredLifetime=86400 and ValidLifetime=43200. And here the weird
> things
> began. On Vista and 7 the values for the "Lifetimes" where updated to
> the new
> ones derived from the RA, but the prefix status didn't change. It
>> still
> was
> stuck in status "deprecated". Hence the still valid IPv6 addresses
>> from
> that
> prefix (2001:db8:1:2::/64) wasn't used as source addresses for new
> connections,
> only old connections used it and incoming packets where answered.
> 
> On XP it was different. The prefix came back to life, changed to
>> status
> "preferred" and the system again used it's 2001:db8:1:2::/64 IPv6
> addresses as
> source address for new connections.
> 
> To proof it I replicated the test, and restarted all machines
> beforehand. But
> the result didn't change, hence it seems it is "stable" behavior.
> 
> I assume it's not the proper behavior, but found no clue in RFC4862
> (SLAAC)
> where I was looking for allowed status changes or similar.
> Has anybody seen a similar behavior or made similar tests with
>> different
> results?
> 
> BTW. I used radvd 1.1 on Ubuntu 9.04 on the router side.
> 
> cheers,
> Christian
> ------------------
> gpg fingerprint:
> 31E4 283B 5EFD 920C 3DD4  CC3E EA43 16EC 75BC EB6D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksWKD8ACgkQ6kMW7HW8623hcgCgpIXQzY5uCoBFW+NQtgb3wYHK
uM0An2ig9SFdJh1wUSbmpN0+p+VyuBo4
=Qn8+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list