Biggest mistake for IPv6: It's not backwards compatible, developers admit

[Mohacsi Janos]

On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 16:52, Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi at niif.hu> wrote:
>
>> okay it seems to me, that shim6 is a good candidate for your problem with
>> some extension allowing specifing amount of outgoing traffic going on
>> paralel links.
>
> And incoming. Eyeball-prevalent networks will need to do more TE on
> the incoming traffic. You can't always expect the other side to be
> fully cooperative, unfortunately.

This is a contractual or administrative issue. If your provider wants you 
you as a customer, they have to serve you: provide knobs to able to tune 
your traffic patterns.

>
>
>
> -- 
> Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx
>