Connectivity to Latin American NRENs

[Michael Lambert]

Just in case they aren't on the list I've forwarded this message to  
the ESnet folks.

Michael

On 13 Oct 2007, at 16:35, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 04:03:59PM -0400, William F. Maton  
> Sotomayor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> However, some of the stinky^Wgood discussions usually point somewhere
>> to Internet 2, although it was my understanding that this had been
>> sorted out.  I've also raised issues with CANARIE regarding access to
>> IPv6 networks through the GEANT peering with some, albeit slower
>> success.  I'm not sure that it's a technical issue so much as a  
>> policy
>> one at times.
>>
>> But, they will listen, so feel free to contact 'eng -at- canarie dot
>> ca' to glean a response from them.
>
> The interesting thing with Canarie is that they do have a crappy  
> inbound
> connectivity
>
> HOST: svr02.teleport-iabg.de      Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best   
> Wrst StDev
>   1. backbone2-gige-0-3-15.telepo  0.0%    20    0.5   0.7   0.3    
> 0.9   0.2
>   2. fe-0-2-2.rt7.muc3.m-online.n  0.0%    20    2.0  92.6   1.0  
> 1397. 317.5
>   3. unknown.ar1.MUN1.gblx.net     0.0%    20    1.8   1.7   1.2    
> 2.3   0.3
>   4. 2001:440:eeee:ffc8::2         0.0%    20  169.1 169.7 168.5  
> 170.9   0.9
>   5. 2001:440:eeee:ffc8::2         0.0%    20  170.6 169.6 168.3  
> 171.2   1.0
>   6. sl-bb1v6-rly-t-96.sprintv6.n  0.0%    20  244.0 243.1 242.0  
> 244.4   0.9
>   7. 2001:ca0:1::1:1              15.0%    20  621.3 603.1 503.8  
> 769.5  62.5
>   8. tunnel-chttl-lavanoc.lava.ne 15.0%    20  590.3 610.3 476.1  
> 835.0  87.3
>   9. 3ffe:8070:1:13::1            10.0%    20  613.5 656.3 554.7  
> 778.0  60.8
>  10. 2001:1228:11b:90a::1         15.0%    20  738.5 842.1 717.3  
> 1000.  94.4
>  11. 2001:1228:10a:f09::1         25.0%    20  834.7 853.8 716.6  
> 982.2  74.0
>  12. 2001:1228:10a:f02::2         15.0%    20  791.6 887.3 791.6  
> 1038.  75.3
>  13. 2001:1348:1:2::1             20.0%    20  889.5 872.6 756.7  
> 968.4  62.7
>  14. canet-1-is-jmb-776.sttlwa.pa 25.0%    20  658.4 672.2 593.2  
> 827.2  64.3
>  15. 2001:410:101:2::2            20.0%    20  625.6 636.5 577.0  
> 700.6  46.1
>  16. 2001:478:149::1              21.1%    19  582.6 663.8 547.5  
> 851.7  73.9
>  17. 2001:478:149::11             21.1%    19  731.5 728.5 578.7  
> 872.1  94.0
>  18. ncrgate-pap-3.ipv6.nrc.ca    15.8%    19  689.3 717.8 550.9  
> 834.6  75.7
>  19. ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca           26.3%    19  633.3 713.2 594.4  
> 831.0  74.0
>
> but decent outbound connectivity...
>
> *  2001:1b10::/32   	25689 2884 6509 3425 293 3549 8767 29259 i
>
> Canarie - ESnet - commercial players (path seems to have pMTU problems
> btw)
>
> Now if ES.net could follow best practice and announce everyone who  
> gets a
> fulltable from them to their upstreams/peers, the problems would be
> solved for Canarie at least. Anyone having contacts for es.net?
>
> Regards,
> Bernhard