Mexico to Stop IPv4 Address Assignments Starting 2011

[Fred Baker]

I'm; of the opinion that an IPv6 turn-up is clueful and wise.

I am of the opinion that IPv4 will be with us for quite a while, and  
the widely-proposed IPv4 turn-down makes no business sense.

You heard it here first :-)

On Jun 27, 2007, at 7:24 PM, virendra rode // wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Fred Baker wrote:
>> That's actually not quite what it says. It says that after 2011  
>> there is
>> reason to believe that it will not be able to, and therefore
>> *recommends* that Mexican networks complete a turn-up of IPv6 packet
>> networks by then so that new allocations in or after 2011 can be all
>> IPv6 allocations. It doesn't address the existing IPv4 Internet,  
>> which
>> one would expect to continue to operate.
> - --------------------------
> I agree.
>
> I was just trying to get feedback of what folks thought or heard  
> about this.
>
>
> regards,
> /virendra
>
>
>
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2007, at 8:47 PM, virendra rode // wrote:
>>
>> http://www.nic.mx/es/Noticias_2?NEWS=220
>>
>>
>>
>> regards,
>> /virendra
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFGgxvVpbZvCIJx1bcRAljBAJ4makLJM3t5mKM+BMC6fCZCXtgW0gCfR7ja
> pOMb9QEDV04Ny/POY/DyBes=
> =P/EH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20070627/da21e289/PGP.bin