Abilene - GEANT (was: Seeing Teredo traffic from Vista?)

Matthew Davy mpd at grnoc.iu.edu
Fri Feb 16 20:38:17 CET 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On Feb 16, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>
> That's _excellent_ news! Does Equinix still require a separate switch
> port for IPv6?

I asked them about this the other day.   My understanding is that  
sometime soon they will assign IPv6 blocks to the current v4 unicast  
public broadcast domain.      They also said if I ran dual-stack over  
my port they would support that the same as v4.    My understanding  
from their email is that I could assign an IPv6 address to my  
interface on the public exchange today and establish peers.     
Although, I'd rather wait until Equinix designates a v6 address block  
for the exchange.

- - Matt



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFF1ggqlW/4XGQiy+sRAnz0AKCSC0y1Fq2zuff3R0vG5kTYqpDsMQCghxdI
hQjt1oW0bHsJIPkvN/4QiaA=
=/zR2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list