Abilene - GEANT (was: Seeing Teredo traffic from Vista?)
mpd at grnoc.iu.edu
Fri Feb 16 20:38:17 CET 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Feb 16, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> That's _excellent_ news! Does Equinix still require a separate switch
> port for IPv6?
I asked them about this the other day. My understanding is that
sometime soon they will assign IPv6 blocks to the current v4 unicast
public broadcast domain. They also said if I ran dual-stack over
my port they would support that the same as v4. My understanding
from their email is that I could assign an IPv6 address to my
interface on the public exchange today and establish peers.
Although, I'd rather wait until Equinix designates a v6 address block
for the exchange.
- - Matt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the ipv6-ops