Routing to ARIN from Teleglobe (2001:5a0::/32)
jeroen at unfix.org
Sun Feb 11 18:15:25 CET 2007
Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 11:44:51AM -0500, Randy Epstein wrote:
>>> Along with a lot more than one hundred other allocations. Thanks to
>>> Jeroen there is a nifty tool to analyze the situation
>> According to Jeroen's tool, the number is 63. Out of those 63, 30 of those
>> prefixes are not seen by most (some are exchange (IX) prefixes, some are
>> just not routed to the Internet as a whole, etc). This leaves 33, with most
>> likely half being resolved if Teleglobe would peer with OCCAID.
> I bet both of my hands that the number used to be around 150 yesterday.
> Wait, not only yesterday, this has been an issue since (grepping IRC
> logs) at least mid-August 2006. OCCAID have been missing quite some
> routes since then, now they are apparently starting to fix it.
> Jeroen, is there a way to get the "Missing prefixes" thing for a past
No, as GRH doesn't know any more today, what prefixes where present
yesterday etc. This could be solved by having per-prefix a 'seen'/'not
seen' mark, whenever it toggles though.
You can look at the lookingglass (/tools/grh/lg/) to check how many
prefixes where announced at a certain date. This does not make the
missing ones visible though.
You might want to check RIS, as RIPE does have a large system for
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 311 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20070211/54066a0d/signature.bin
More information about the ipv6-ops