APNIC IPv6 transit exchange

[Andrew Ruthven]

On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 21:39 +0100, Leo Vegoda wrote:

> If you look at APNIC's web site[1] you'll see that 2001:0C00:/23 is  
> reserved for prefixes as long as /48[2]. /35 is shorter than /48, so  
> what's the problem here?

The issue I encountered when trying to advertise a /35 from an addresss
block allocated from within this /23 is a number of networks didn't
accept it.  No doubt because they're filtering out anything longer
than /32.  And Gert's example set of filters don't allow these routes.

I don't suppose anyone knows of a site that is collecting all the
different policies together?

Cheers!

-- 
Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand
At work: andrew.ruthven at catalyst.net.nz
At home: andrew at etc.gen.nz
GPG fpr: 34CA 12A3 C6F8 B156 72C2  D0D7 D286 CE0C 0C62 B791
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20071203/a15770b6/attachment.bin