Question for IPv6 w.g. on [Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0
itojun at itojun.org
Thu Apr 26 18:06:46 CEST 2007
bob, you don't understand the problem at all. did you see my email?
> thanks for the heads-up
> On Apr 25, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> > We are starting a discussion on the Routing Header Type 0 issue on
> > the IPv6 mailing list.
> > Bob Hinden / Brian Haberman
> > IPv6 w.g. chairs
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >> From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden at nokia.com>
> >> Date: April 25, 2007 5:39:40 PM PDT
> >> To: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6 at ietf.org>
> >> Subject: Question for IPv6 w.g. on [Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header
> >> issues]
> >> Reply-To: bob.hinden at nokia.com
> >> [trimming this to just the IPv6 w.g.]
> >> We think the question for the IPv6 working group on this topic is
> >> does the working group want to do anything to address the issues
> >> raised about the Type 0 routing header. Possible actions include:
> >> 1) Deprecate all usage of RH0
> >> 2) Recommend that RH0 support be off by default in hosts and routers
> >> 3) Recommend that RH0 support be off by default in hosts
> >> 4) Limit it's usage to one RH0 per IPv6 packet and limit the
> >> number of addresses in one RH0.
> >> These examples are not all mutually exclusive.
> >> Please respond to the list with your preference and justifications.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bob Hinden / Brian Haberman
> >> IPv6 W.G. Chairs
> >> p.s. We will send a note to the other lists that the IPv6 w.g.
> >> will be discussing this issue.
More information about the ipv6-ops