The IPv6 Day: Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Tue Jun 6 16:56:28 CEST 2006
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> You can have a tunnel and still be stable. I don't see the problem there.
> Agree that native is better, but being non-for-profit and experiments, is
> more than enough.
> I even will say that, even if I encourage production services to use native
> connectivity, I don't see big issues today in using stable tunnels.
I think the keyword here is latency...
IMHO, bad tunnels only keep (more) people away from IPv6 -- and who might
be interested in that?!?!?
Wide Area Network (WAN) Workgroup, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN
FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional http://www.fccn.pt
"Internet is just routes (184902/571), naming (millions) and... people!"
More information about the ipv6-ops