3-level more-specific leak... sigh

Daniel Roesen dr at cluenet.de
Tue Dec 26 17:50:51 CET 2006


Hi,

2001:48d0::/32       3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0::/33       3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0::/34       3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0::/35       3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:2000::/35  3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:4000::/34  3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:4000::/35  3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:6000::/35  3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:8000::/33  3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:8000::/34  3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:8000::/35  3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:a000::/35  3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:c000::/34  3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:c000::/35  3549 11537 2153 195
2001:48d0:e000::/35  3549 11537 2153 195

Could folks at 3549, 11537 and 2153 please check their filters?
Those more-specifics should certainly not leak up to 3549 (or farther).

Makes me wonder wether there is any filtering in place at all...


Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list