Filters

Bartek Gajda gajda at man.poznan.pl
Tue May 24 12:33:08 CEST 2005


And what about prefixes between /32 and /35
I can see at least two like this:

2001:5C0:8000::/34
inet6num:     2001:05e8:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000/32
netname:      PSCNET-V6
descr:        Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
country:      US

2001:5E8::/33
inet6num:     2001:05c0:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000/32
netname:      HEXAGO-V6-NET1
country:      CA

These are bad guys and deserve punishment from their RIR!?
:-/

Bart

Jeroen Massar wrote:

>[can I invite ISP's who are not peering with GRH to peer with the
>system? See http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/peering/ for the details.
>The more information it receives the better the quality.]
>
>On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 20:55 -0400, Kevin Loch wrote: 
>  
>
>>Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Updated but only announcing the /35:
>>>2001:358::/32 	[jp] Japan 	MIND-JPNIC-JP-20011115
>>>2001:390::/32 	[kr] Korea 	HANINTERNET-KRNIC-KR-20020207
>>>2001:438::/32 	[us] United States 	ABOVENET-IPV6
>>>2001:4d8::/32 	[us] United States 	DOTNET-001
>>>      
>>>
>>and Qwest 2001:428::/32 (which for some reason doesn't show up in the 
>>sixxs.net tla visibility charts.
>>    
>>
>
>There was a silly matching problem, blame me, fixed now, if I am correct.
>The /32 is not there, but the /35 is btw, in total, as per:
>
>https://noc.sixxs.net/tools/grh/tla/all/?country=all
>
>The database currently holds 990 IPv6 TLA's.
>Of which 30 (3.03%) are returned to the pool, 401 (40.51%) IPv6 TLA's
>didn't have a routing entry.
>Thus 559 (56.46%) networks are currently announced.
>9 (0.91%) only announced a /35 while they have been allocated a /32.
>8 (0.81%) announce both their /32 and their /35.
>
>Have a /32 but announce a /35:
>2001:230::/32 [kr] Korea ETRI-KRNIC-KR-19991124
>2001:358::/32 [jp] Japan MIND-JPNIC-JP-20011115
>2001:390::/32 [kr] Korea HANINTERNET-KRNIC-KR-20020207
>2001:428::/32 [us] United States QWEST-IPV6-1
>2001:438::/32 [us] United States ABOVENET-IPV6
>2001:450::/32 [us] United States GBLX-V6
>2001:4d8::/32 [us] United States DOTNET-001
>2001:6d8::/32 [pl] Poland PL-CYFRONET-20010221
>2001:dc0::/32 [ap] Asian Pacific APNIC-AP-V6-20030124
>
>Announcing both the /32 and /35:
>2001:258::/32 [jp] Japan INFOWEB-JPNIC-JP-2000502
>2001:2c0::/32 [jp] Japan INFOSPHERE-JPNIC-JP-20010208
>2001:340::/32 [jp] Japan FINE-JPNIC-JP-20011030
>2001:3d0::/32 [jp] Japan PTOP-JPNIC-JP-20020521
>2001:400::/32 [us] United States ESNET-V6
>2001:420::/32 [us] United States CISCO-IPV6-1
>2001:490::/32 [us] United States NOKIA-1
>2001:4b0::/32 [us] United States AOLTIMEWARNER
>
><smileyhat> (Cisco and Nokia don't trust their own routers? :) </smileyhat>
>
>Greets,
> Jeroen
>
>  
>


More information about the ipv6-ops mailing list