Consensus on MHAP/v6 Multi-homing

[Jeroen Massar]

On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 15:06 +0200, Alexander Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 20 April 2005 15:05:34 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > Take your pick. As far as I read it now you are an ISP, not an IX.
> 
> why not both?
> 
> we connect to their switch network natively, all fine with
> that, and we additionally peer with one connected party,
> which is AS 1752, which happens to be run by the same ppl.

As they are the same people, why not use the space from the ISP for the
'services' of the IX then? And of course one could also use it for the
interconnect of the IX if you want.

Greets,
 Jeroen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/attachments/20050420/3bdd55c7/attachment.bin